Top

Franklin County

Franklin County’s Town Canes (Part 2 of 4): Chambersburg’s Town Cane

Dec 1928 Public Opinion Article

The idea of a Town Cane evidently struck Chambersburg residents very well, because at least six Chambersburg men received the Public Opinion Town Cane.

 

 

Dr. Platt & Burgess Pensinger

Dr. George Fisk Platt, Civil War veteran and retired dentist, was the first recipient of Chambersburg’s Town Cane. Burgess Clyde H. Pensinger presented the Cane to Dr. Platt on his 94th birthday at his N. Main Street home on 10 April 1929. Unlike the Boston Post Cane, it was described as “a handsome stick with a sterling silver handle.”[1] But like the Boston Post  Cane, it was provided by the local newspaper. Platt expressed his appreciation in being the first recipient and “promised to use it regularly.” He thanked the Public Opinion for “carrying out the idea” and Pensinger for presenting the Cane.[2] Dr. George Fisk Platt died in August 1929 in Chambersburg.[3]

 

 

 

 

 

McLucas & Burgess Pensinger

Solomon McLucas, also a Civil War veteran, was the next person to receive the Town Cane. Burgess Pensinger presented the Cane to the 94-year-old former farmer and father of eight in September 1929. McLucas and his wife moved to Montgomery Avenue about 1920.[4] “Although the holder of the Town Cane, Mr. McLucas does not deign to use it. He shuns the use of any aid to locomotion.”[5] His daughter reported “that right after he received the cane…[he] did not seem to appreciate it. But the idea grew upon him, and he became its proud holder and found great joy in its possession.”[6] Solomon McLucas died in June 1932 at his Chambersburg home.[7] At least six Public Opinion articles mentioned him as holder of the Town Cane.

 

 

 

 

Nace & Burgess Vanderau

David Benjamin Nace of Montgomery Avenue, another Civil War veteran, was presented with the Town Cane in April 1933. Burgess Robert C. Vanderau presented the Cane to the 94-year-old who was “one of the organizers of the Chambersburg Hospital and for many years treasurer of the board.” Nace expressed his appreciation and stated, “that he would cherish the cane throughout the remainder of his days.”[8] David Benjamin Nace died in October 1933 at his home in Chambersburg.[9]

 

 

 

 

 

 

It took almost a year to find the next recipient because, “the last time the Town Cane was given, a mistake was almost…given to the second oldest Chambersburger. Therefore, this time we are proceeding slowly in order to be sure the oldest man gets it.”[10]

Immell & Burgess Vanderau

George Washington Immell Sr., “well known retired produce dealer [of] Philadelphia Avenue,” was the next “man living in town” to receive the Town Cane.[11] In February 1934 Burgess Vanderau presented the Cane to Immell on his 92nd birthday, “on behalf of the Public Opinion.[12] Two years later, the newspaper congratulated him for spending his 94th birthday shoveling snow. The article reminded people, “the Town Cane is possessed by Chambersburg’s oldest male. A cane was selected…because such a prop has long been associated with great length of years in man.”[13] Unfortunately, on his 95th birthday, Immell fell “in his bedroom as he arose from an afternoon nap [and] fractured his left leg.” He spent the rest of his birthday in the Chambersburg Hospital.[14] He was admitted to the hospital again in May “as the result of complications developing from his fractured leg.”[15] George Washington Immell Sr. died in May 1937 at the hospital.[16] At least fifteen Public Opinion articles mentioned him as holder of the Town Cane.

 

 

 

The Public Opinion wondered “how one would hope to use the cane—whether he could swing it, may be a little jauntily, or would have to use it as a prop, as a crutch to aid a diseased and time-wracked body to get about.”[17]

Slaugenhaup & Burgess Vanderau

William Paxton “Pax” Slaughenhaup, a 92-year-old former horse breeder, was the next in line for the Town Cane. Besides working as a horse dealer and owning stables on S. Main Street, he raised Holstein cattle and worked in the hay and straw business. He also recalled “tended horses in the mountains at the time of the burning of Chambersburg by the confederates.”[18] He received the Cane from Burgess Vanderau in his room at the Hotel LaMar in June 1937. “Except for blindness, Mr. Slaughenhaup enjoys all his faculties and is in excellent health.” Almost one year after breaking his left leg in a fall, William Paxton Slaughenhaup died in March 1938 at Hotel LaMar.[19]

 

 

 

 

 

Holcomb & Burgess Vanderau

Wallace Holcomb of N. Main Street was the sixth and last known recipient of the Public Opinion Town Cane. Holcomb was a retired farmer and sheep rancher; hardware, lumber, and coal dealer; coal miner; justice of the peace; and mayor in Massachusetts and Connecticut. “Several years ago, Mr. Holcomb and his daughter, Miss V. Louise Holcomb, professor of psychology and philosophy at Wilson College…took up permanent residence in Chambersburg.”[20] Burgess Vanderau again presented the cane on behalf of the newspaper in May 1938. The “tall, spare, white-haired” Holcomb beat out Peter Schaffnit by just three months. Schaffnit died in November 1939 and was never eligible for the cane, because Wallace Holcomb died in June 1941 at their home on N. Main Street after a five-month illness.[21] His daughter was his only descendant.

 

 

 

 

Who Gets Town Cane?

Holcomb was the last documented holder of the Public Opinion Town Cane. A call for nominations of the next recipient appeared in July 1941. “Who Gets Town Cane? The death of Wallace Holcomb makes the Town Cane available for presentation to the oldest male citizen of Chambersburg. PUBLIC OPINION will be glad to receive the name of those who may be in line to hold the cane. Communications should be addressed to the editor in care of this paper.”[22] Note that the recipient must still be male. No article announcing the next recipient has been found.

 

(To be continued in Part 3: Waynesboro’s Town Cane)

 

[1] “Gets Town Cane,” Public Opinion (Chambersburg, Penn.), 13 Apr 1929, p. 1, col. 1.

[2] “Some Private Opinions of Public Opinion,” Public Opinion, 15 Apr 1929, p. 10, col. 1.

[3] Penns. Dept. of Health, Death Cert. no. 83366 (1929), George Fisk Platt, “Pennsylvania Death Certificates 1906-1970,” Ancestry (https://www.ancestry.com/discoveryui-content/view/3532115:5164).

[4] “Chambersburg Man, 94, to be Given Town Cane,” Public Opinion, 14 Sep 1929, p. 4, col. 5.

[5] “Holder of Town Cane is Nearing 97 but he Walks without Aid of the Cane,” Public Opinion, 24 Feb 1932, p. 1, col. 2.

[6] “Some Private Opinions of Public Opinion,” Public Opinion, 1 July 1932, p. 12, col. 1.

[7] “Deaths: Solomon McLucas,” Public Opinion, 27 June 1932, p. 2, col. 3.

[8] “Town Cane Awarded to Civil War Veteran, 94,” Public Opinion, 10 Apr 1933, p. 1, col. 5.

[9] “Holder of Town Cane Dies,” Public Opinion, 9 Oct 1933, p. 2, col. 5.

[10] “Some Private Opinions of Public Opinion,” Public Opinion, 13 July 1932, p. 10, col. 1.

[11] “Some Private Opinions of Public Opinion,” Public Opinion, 23 Jan 1934, p. 8, col. 2.

[12] “Town Cane Given to Aged Citizen on 92d Birthday,” Public Opinion, 16 Feb 1934, p. 1, col. 2.

[13] “Some Private Opinions of Public Opinion,” Public Opinion, 18 Feb 1936, p. 8, col. 1.

[14] “Oldest Town Man Falls in Bedroom, Breaks Leg,” Public Opinion, 16 Feb 1937, p. 1, col. 6.

[15] “Aged Man Critically Ill,” Public Opinion, 10 May 1937, p. 1, col. 1.

[16] “Aged Citizen Dies,” Public Opinion, 25 May 1937, p. 2, col. 1.

[17] “Some Private Opinions of Public Opinion,” Public Opinion, 3 June 1937, p. 20, col. 1-2.

[18] “Town Cane Given Fifth Recipient by Public Opinion,” Public Opinion, 1 July 1937, p. 1, col. 3.

[19] “Deaths: W. Paxton Slaughenhaup,” Public Opinion, 30 Mar 1938, p. 2, col. 2.

[20] “Town’s Oldest Citizen is Given Symbolic Cane,” Public Opinion, 12 May 1938, p. 1, col. 3.

[21] “Deaths: Wallace Holcomb,” Public Opinion, 16 June 1941, p. 2, col. 2.

[22] “Who Gets Town Cane?” Public Opinion, 15 July 1941, p. 1, col. 3.

Franklin County’s Town Canes (Part 1 of 4): History of the Town Cane

The concept of passing a Town Cane to the oldest living male resident began in Boston in 1909, mainly to improve newspaper sales. The Public Opinion newspaper copied the idea twenty years later when Chambersburg implemented the passing of its Town Cane in 1929. Waynesboro followed in 1934. However, people began inquiring into the whereabouts of Chambersburg’s Cane in 1956 and again in 2023. Although each recipient was well documented in over fifty newspaper articles, neither Chambersburg nor Waynesboro’s Town Cane has been located.

The Boston Post Town Cane

The Boston Post Cane

In 1891 Edwin Atkins Grozier purchased the Boston Post newspaper which was near bankruptcy. As its publisher and editor, he needed a plan to make his failing newspaper profitable. After bidding on an unclaimed shipment of walking canes, he devised a plan to increase the newspaper’s circulation. On 2 August 1909, Grozier sent letters and canes to approximately seven hundred selectmen (local government officials) in Massachusetts, Maine, New Hampshire, and Rhode Island “with the request that it be presented with the compliments of the Boston Post to the oldest male citizen of the town, to be used by him as long as he lives.”

The canes were manufactured by J. F. Fradley and Company of New York in a year-long process. They were made from seven-foot lengths of Gaboon ebony from the African Congo. The canes were topped with a two-inch 14-carat gold head “engraved with the inscription, ‘Presented by the Boston Post to the oldest citizen of [town, state] (to be transmitted).’”[1]

Although the “rules” seemed clear, questions arose as to who should receive the Cane. The Post’s staff were often asked to settle disputes regarding proof of age, residence, and voting status. The definition of “citizen” was also questioned:

The most common Question has been as to whether both sexes were eligible for the cane. The intention of the Post from the outset has been that the cane should be presented to the oldest male. The word “citizen” has been intended by the Post to mean the oldest registered male voter.[2]

When the Equal Suffrage Amendment was ratified in 1920, the presentation of the Cane was eventually opened to women—in some places.

But not everyone was enthusiastic about receiving a symbol of a marketing scheme or their advancing age. It became harder to find people willing to take the Cane. “Others suspected a scam. A few were scared off by rumors of a curse, and to doom those who dared take the cane home. ‘People now think of it as a reminder of their age and limited time left’.”[3] And canes were sometimes presented to the wrong person. Like the end of the passing of the Town Cane, the Boston Post folded in 1956. Over the years, many Canes were lost, stolen, removed from the town, or just not returned. To date only approximately five hundred original Town Canes have been located.

Pennsylvania’s First Town Cane

Dec 1928 Public Opinion Article

Weatherly in Carbon County, Pennsylvania, claims starting their Town Cane tradition earlier than 1909, but this has not been proven.[4] Like the Post, this new tradition was used by the Weatherly Herald newspaper to improve its circulation.[5] J. F. Kressley, Weatherly’s former chief burgess (town mayor), supposedly established the tradition in 1907. “It was the duty of the chief burgess publicly to present it to the oldest man remaining a resident of the borough.” By 1923 Weatherly boasted five recipients with the following inscription on their Town Cane: “Our Tribute to the Oldest Gentleman Resident of Weatherly, and His Successors. September 1907.”[6] On 19 December 1928, Weatherly’s announcement of its seventh Town Cane recipient was printed in Chambersburg’s Public Opinion.[7] Two days later, the newspaper asked its readers, “How does the Town Cane idea strike you?”[8]

 

(To be continued in Part 2: Chambersburg’s Town Cane)

 

[1] The Boston Post Cane Information Center (https://bostonpostcane.org).

[2] Barbara Staples, “Launching of the Boston Post Cane,” The Bay State’s Boston Post Canes: The History of a New England Tradition (Flemming Press, 1999), 25-31.

[3] Jenna Russell, “Congratulations, You’re the Oldest Person in Town! Please Accept This Cane,” 20 Jan 2024, The New York Times (https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/20/us/congratulations-youre-the-oldest-person-in-town-please-accept-this-cane.html).

[4] Negative search for earlier evidence of Town Cane in Carbon County, 1907-1910.

[5] “Cane for Oldest Man,” Tunkhannock New Age (Tunkhannock, Penn.), 20 July 1911, p. 2, col.3.

[6] “Laden May Get Cane,” The Plain Speaker (Hazelton, Penn.), 22 Dec 1923, p. 8, col. 6.

[7] “Young, Rather Old, Gets Town Cane,” article from Weatherly, Public Opinion (Chambersburg, Penn.), 19 Dec 1928, p. 1, col. 6.

[8] “Some Private Opinions of Public Opinion,” 21 Dec 1928, p. 16, col. 2.

Researching House Histories: First the Family, Then the House

One of the most frequently asked questions at our Historical Society and our Archives in Franklin County is, “How can I find when my house was built?” Following is a taste of our workshop, “Researching Franklin County House Histories.” When researching house histories, the most important principle is that you must research the family to research the house. However, another guideline is to find similar houses in the same area, that may provide clues to builders and time periods.

I’ve lived in my late 19th century house since 1986. Unlike urban areas, my house sits alone in rural Franklin County, and it’s harder to find an exact duplicate. But driving to Greencastle, six miles southwest of where I live, there is a house that always attracted my attention—because it’s my house’s twin. The exterior has the same brick pattern, front porch style, side porches, slate roof, chimneys, windows, doors, etc. Photos of my house are on the left, and it’s twin are on the right.

 

 

 

 

 

 

But I’ve always wondered about the inside—until now. Through county tax records, I found the current owner and researched the title back to the earliest deeds. Like my house, there was no mention of the house itself—only the property. Like mine, it was likely built in the late 19th century. I then contacted the owner, who invited me to see his house. Merritt and I spent about two hours talking about how our houses were similar.

His kitchen is still located where my original kitchen used to be. My former kitchen is now my dining room. My current kitchen is part of a 1970s addition. My former and his current kitchen also differ in that mine has a bay window, and his doesn’t, something he would love to have to let more light in. But both have the original wainscoting. Our basement doors are located in this room, and both have an exterior access.

Our interior doors, baseboard, and trim are also similar.

   

But I have transoms over the downstairs doorways.

    

And my floorboards are wider.

   

My double front doors are original. Merritt couldn’t find anyone to repair his and had to replace them with a sidelight and single door. But the transom and trim remain the same. Our tiny front entrance foyers are the same, with one room to the right and one to the left. However, Merritt removed wall sections on both sides of the main stairway to give it a more open feel, which brightens the whole area. His stairway had full walls on both sides, but mine is open on the top left with a railing on the second floor. One huge difference is that my house has a second back stairway leading into the former kitchen, and his only has the front stairs.

   

My first and second floor side porches (opposite side of his house) were enclosed by former owners to add hallways and a bathroom. His remain original, and they are awesome.

   

Neither of our houses had bathrooms in the 1800s, and the former owners chose different locations for our upstairs bathrooms. We both have identical second-floor closets, located under the stairways, that are accessed by going up 2 steps.

I then invited Merritt to my house, and he was also amazed at the likenesses. We believe our houses were built around the same time, don’t know by whom, but will continue to look for clues. Merritt will also be my guest at the 5-hour “Researching Franklin County House Histories” workshop on Monday, June 27 2022 that I am coordinating with the Franklin County Archives and Geographic Information Systems. It will be held at the Franklin County Visitors Bureau, one of our sponsors with the Franklin County Historical Society. To register, complete and return the Registration Form to [email protected].

Through researching my house history, I found more than my house’s twin. I found another historic house enthusiast. Maybe you will, too.

Vacationing with Your Ancestors – With the Help of a Certified Tourism Ambassador (CTA)

It’s that time of year when we all begin planning and looking forward to summer vacations. And if you’re like me, you try to schedule at least one trip around researching some of your ancestors in a really great place—and everyone in Franklin County, Pennsylvania hopes your ancestors lived here—and that you’ll be visiting us soon!

To help prepare for your trip, check out our Certified Tourism Ambassador (CTA) program through the Franklin County Visitors Bureau (FCVB). This year, the FCVB invested in this nationwide program whose objective is “to increase regional tourism by inspiring front-line employees and volunteers to turn every visitor encounter into a positive experience.” So how does a CTA fit into a genealogy vacation?

Franklin County’s First CTA Training

 

 

 

 

 

 

My hope is that by becoming a CTA, I can make every researchers’ visit to Franklin County the most fulfilling it can be. I do this by studying all aspects of Franklin County, to be the go-to source for finding Pennsylvania ancestors. I’ve learned through experience that my most successful trips were those where I contacted area experts who helped guide my research. Rather than using the hit-and-miss method when I wasn’t familiar with county towns and townships, these knowledgeable people pointed me to the most important repositories and sights, such as:

  • Courthouses & Archives
  • Historical Societies & Libraries
  • Ancestral Homes & Farms
  • Schools
  • Businesses
  • Churches
  • Funeral Homes & Cemeteries

Besides giving directions, locals also know what records each repository may hold that will helpful when researching your family history. We also know the best and most convenient lodging, restaurants, and other non-genealogy things to do (for any family members who might not be into the research thing).

So when planning your “family” vacation, don’t forget to contact someone who will make sure you spend your time as efficiently and productively as possible. In Franklin County, it’s definitely a CTA—and it could be me!

Janet Pollard, Franklin County Visitor’s Bureau, and a new CTA

 

You Always Remember Your First Time. . . .

Your First Franklin County Genealogy Workshop, Of Course!

Yes, it’s over *sad face* but it was so much fun! A great group attended our first “Finding Family in Franklin County” genealogy workshop. Because of their honest feedback, I am calling this our Pilot Program. I especially enjoyed catching up with everyone at breakfast and dinner. My first question was always—hesitantly—“Did you find any new records?” And the answer from everyone was, “YES!” Someone even found a real live cousin!

The attendees from Virginia, Philadelphia and Pittsburgh checked into the Mercersburg Inn at noon on Wednesday. That afternoon, we presented three 45-minute sessions:

Wednesday night, we met for dinner at the James Buchanan Pub and Restaurant for great conversation and discussion of plans for Thursday—where people going and what they were looking for.

Justin McHenry with Bill & Nancy at the Franklin County Archives

On Thursday morning we met for breakfast to give everyone an encouraging send-off. Individuals went to the Conococheague Institute in Welsh Run, Fendrick Library in Mercersburg—actually 2 people went there Wednesday before and after dinner—the Franklin County Historical Society and of course, the much heralded Franklin County Archives. Coincidentally, everyone was researching in the south-western part of the county, so they could discuss where they were going and what resources they were looking for. As I checked in at the various repositories, it was evident that everyone was doing fine, and appreciated the time to research on their own. We met again for dinner and to share what everyone found. Justin McHenry at the Archives was clearly the star of the day, finding records that others were not aware existed.

Jean working at the Franklin County Historical Society

On Friday morning, at our final meal together, the group openly shared their thoughts on the workshop. This was a true debrief of what everyone liked and what could be improved for next time—and there WILL be a next time! Because of the great relationships we developed in three short days, we got excellent feedback on what to continue and what to add. Some of the suggestions were to include historic tours as an option, rotate the venue around the county, discuss more about cemeteries and church records, and include more “locals” from the genealogy community—all ideas that we will definitely look at incorporating into the next session.

But mostly there was praise for the workshop:

“This workshop would benefit beginning researchers as well as more experienced researchers because we could choose What and Where to research and go at our own pace. The discussions about the local repositories and what they offer was the jumping off point for us to explore what interested us. Pam was an excellent facilitator to point us in the most advantageous direction for our personal research goals.”

I couldn’t have worked with a better team. Thank you Janet and Justin—and my advisors!!

Me with my group of “Advisors”

After the group picture—it’s what we genealogists do—I thought everyone would head home, but I was wrong. After checking out, everyone went on another excursion, either to a repository or sight-seeing around the county. And I went home, satisfied that we did what we set out to do—help others Find Family in Franklin County.

We take pride in our work, and it shows

What Our Clients Are Saying